Thank you for the reviews!
On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 12:28 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> This issue can occur not only when the number of sync standbys is reduced,
> but also when the configured standby names change. For example, if the config
> changes from "FIRST 2 (sby1, sby2)" to "FIRST 2 (sby1, sby3)",
> waiters on sby2 should be released immediately. But, currently, there can
> a delay before that happens. Right?
Yes, you're right, so I revised the comments and commit message.
> > My main concern is code duplication. The same block is added in three places. While the existing reload handling is
alreadyduplicated there, adding more logic on top makes the situation a bit worse from a maintenance perspective.
> >
> > Would it make sense to factor the reload handling into a small helper, for example:
>
> +1
I've updated it in the v2 patch.
--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center
