On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 1:01 PM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you, I agree with Álvaro. So, I think it is better to leave them
> > as they are, except for access/relation.h. And, replacing
> > relation_open to table_open looks good to me.
> >
>
> ok.
>
> The attached patch only replaces relation_open to table_open.
> RangeVarCallbackForPolicy already checks that a policy can only be created on a
> table or a partitioned table.
>
> so the replacement should be ok.
Thank you for updating the patch.
But I said "except for access/relation.h". I think access/relation.h
is not necessary if you replace relation_open to table_open.
--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center