Re: Report oldest xmin source when autovacuum cannot remove tuples - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shinya Kato
Subject Re: Report oldest xmin source when autovacuum cannot remove tuples
Date
Msg-id CAOzEurQ8atKjCE95K-bPUWKHrBT03bT+VUj+MhxRF0iDj9SZkg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Report oldest xmin source when autovacuum cannot remove tuples  (wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 2, 2026 at 3:20 PM wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com> wrote:

> However, I would like to advocate strongly for keeping the distinction between
> active and idle-in-transaction sessions (which was present in earlier versions
> but dropped in v10).

Thanks for the review.

Reporting the active versus idle state is out of scope for this patch,
as Fujii-san suggested. I plan to address it in a follow-up patch.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a stored generated column without long-lived locks
Next
From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Date:
Subject: Re: PANIC serves too many masters