Re: The tragedy of SQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Nolan
Subject Re: The tragedy of SQL
Date
Msg-id CAOzAquLE35PVi_jipipktAi-aAG9U36wEuVEk-NWL4b3WMfw4A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
Responses Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
List pgsql-general
Of all the languages I wrote in, I think SNOBOL was the most fun to write in, and LISP the least fun.  Control Data assembler language 
programming was probably the most precise, because you could crash the OS with a single mis-placed character, something I did more than once.

In a graduate-level course, we studied ALGOL-68, which had so many things in it that I'm not sure anybody ever actually implemented the full language.  (But then again, has anybody implemented EVERYTHING in the SQL standard?)  

COBOL has strange verbs like 'move corresponding' that could accomplish complicated tasks in a few lines but you have to be careful that you knew what you were asking for!

And I'd take the SQL standard over the CODASYL standard any time!  
--
Mike Nolan

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Roles
Next
From: Raymond Brinzer
Date:
Subject: Re: The tragedy of SQL