Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > All we need to do to resolve this issue is have Tom commit his patch.
I think Stephen is not being unreasonable to suggest that we need some documentation about what external tools may safely do to pg.auto.conf.
I dare say that if we had some documentation around what to expect and how to deal with it, for our own tools as well as external ones, then maybe we wouldn’t be in this situation in the first place. Clearly ALTER SYSTEM and the pg_basebackup modifications had different understands and expectations.
So somebody's got to write that. But I agree that we could go ahead with the code patch.
I haven’t looked at the code patch at all, just to be clear. That said, if you’re comfortable with it and it’s in line with what we document as being how you handle pg.auto.conf (for ourselves as well as external tools..), then that’s fine with me.
