On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 18:36 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:34:52PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > > This is where I feel like I'm trying to make decisions in a vacuum. If > > we had a few more people weighing in on the thread on this point, I'd > > be happy to go with whatever the consensus was. If most people think > > having both --no-manifest (suppressing the manifest completely) and > > --manifest-checksums=none (suppressing only the checksums) is useless > > and confusing, then sure, let's rip the latter one out. If most people > > like the flexibility, let's keep it: it's already implemented and > > tested. But I hate to base the decision on what one or two people > > think. > > I'm frustrated at the lack of involvement from others also.
Well, the topic of backup manifests feels like it has generated a lot of bickering emails, and people don't want to spend their time dealing with that.
I’d like to not also. I suppose it’s just an area that I’m particularly concerned with that allows me to overcome that. Backups are important to me.
