Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vaishnavi Prabakaran
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
Date
Msg-id CAOoUkxQLiEP7G+ceFCyLEkOZaMoavu-YisXUqZVzm4Z-avM+hQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:

I wonder if we should also consider changing the standby error message to be a WARNING instead of an ERROR. So that if you try to start up a standby with hot_standby=on but master with wal_level=replica it would turn into a cold standby.

Perhaps, you mean hot_standby=off here? 

Regards,
Vaishnavi
Fujitsu Australia.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
Next
From: Huong Dangminh
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?