Re: [PATCH][DOC][MINOR] Fix incorrect lexeme limit in textsearch docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dharin Shah
Subject Re: [PATCH][DOC][MINOR] Fix incorrect lexeme limit in textsearch docs
Date
Msg-id CAOj6k6esm7NoX8sGDd7FVJ=f+ScXqmjGSiwQu0MBW0-amvTxWA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH][DOC][MINOR] Fix incorrect lexeme limit in textsearch docs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sorry to drop the ball on this, will get back to cleaning it up and create a new patch

Thanks,
Dharin

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 11:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Aditya Gollamudi <adigollamudi@gmail.com> writes:
>  +1 on this patch, I was also a bit confused on this part of the
> documentation. All I could conclude was that the number of lexemes in a
> tsvector was limited by existing tsvector limits. I agree with Surya's
> comment about the overlap, I think this patch should only remove the line
> about the 2^64 bound. Patch applies cleanly!

What I'm inclined to do is just drop that <listitem> entirely,
since it's implied by the 1MB space limit.  The patch as-submitted
accomplishes about the same thing, but takes more words to do it.

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Clean up NamedLWLockTranche stuff
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Fix typos: "its a" -> "it's a" in code comments