Hi Tomas,
>> Consider the aspects associated with open addressing.Open addressing
>> can quickly lead to growth in the main table.Also, chaining is a much
>> cleaner way of collision resolution,IMHO.
>
> What do you mean by "growth in the main table"?
Sorry, I should have been more verbose.
AFAIK, Open addressing can be slower with a load factor approaching 1
as compared to chaining. Also, I feel that implementation of open
addressing can be more complicated as we have to deal with deletes
etc.
I feel we can redesign our current chaining mechanism to have skip
lists instead of singly linked lists. I experimented with it sometime
back and I feel that it gives a stable performance with higher loads.
Regards,
Atri
--
Regards,
Atri
l'apprenant
