Re: pg_basebackup and pg_switch_wal() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Israel Barth Rubio
Subject Re: pg_basebackup and pg_switch_wal()
Date
Msg-id CAO_rXXCRSUH9Onp0+aWZ9DZRoZurL6QtcMLDT5kRTVFSuByhKg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup and pg_switch_wal()  (Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_basebackup and pg_switch_wal()
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Fabrice,

> But I do not understand this error with the barman wrapper:

> Backup completed (start time: 2025-07-26 21:45:07.238223, elapsed time: 19 seconds)
> Waiting for the WAL file 0000000300000B3F0000000C from server 'x_service' (max: 600 seconds)
> Processing xlog segments from streaming for x_service
> 0000000300000B3F0000000A
> Processing xlog segments from streaming for x_service
> 0000000300000B3F0000000B
> ERROR: The WAL file 0000000300000B3F0000000C has not been received in 600 seconds

Are you by chance running PostgreSQL 17?

If you are using PostgreSQL 17, you are very likely encountering the issue
a fix has already been merged and will be included in an upcoming release of
Barman.

As a quick note for the future, the Barman GitHub issues page is the correct place
to report problems like this directly to the development team. In any case, I understand
that you raised it here given the context of the original question about pg_basebackup.

Hope that helps you.

Best regards,
Israel.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirk Wolak
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql, new check for extra_errors - strict_expr_check
Next
From: Iván Chavero
Date:
Subject: Re: libxml2 author overwhelmed with security requests