On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:50 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> We are subtracting 30 years from a calculation that we know didnt overflow, so
> I guess if the certificate notBefore (the notAfter cannot be that early since
> we wouldn't be able to connect with it) was set to early enough? It didn't
> strike me as anything above academical unless I'm thinking wrong here.
Yeah, it's super nitpicky. The CA would have had to sign a really
broken certificate somehow, anyway...
I can't find anything else to note; patch LGTM.
Thanks,
--Jacob