Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+nCg5upBVOo_UCSjMfO=YMkZXcSEsgaADKXqerr5wahZQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)  (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 11:42 AM Jacob Champion
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 0001 should be ready to go. I meant to put 0002 up in its own thread
> at the beginning of the week but got sidetracked, so I'll go do that
> now.

Done at [1].

v5 incorporates that version of the patch in -0002 and makes some
minor test updates for better coverage in -0003.

> 0003 has to wait on Valgrind, and 0004-5 have to wait on 0002.

v5-0006 is my experiment in Valgrind (and also AddressSanitizer, and
also generic pointer poisoning). I think it's interesting, and it
seems clean enough for some subset to be committable for 19. The
weak-symbol support for ASan is the most suspect; I have no idea if it
links correctly across all platforms. It's probably better for me to
propose generic ASan support in utils/memdebug.h at some point in the
future, and drop it from this patch.

I don't plan to block the other patches on -0006, since -0004 is
blocking PGOAUTHCAFILE.

--Jacob

[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi%2B%3DMHD%2BWKD4rsTn0v8220mYfyLGhEc5EfhmtqrAb7SmC5g%40mail.gmail.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ilia Evdokimov
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce planning time for large NOT IN lists containing NULL
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: doc: add note that wal_level=logical doesn't set up logical replication in itself