Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+mn_xhkQEyS5KG3zoSOrvskVx8mhD8x_Z+0LL9PaZo1gQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:32 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> wrote:
> And that should also not be a problem for distributions - they could offer a libpq and a libpq_oauth package, where
onlyone of them can be installed at the same time, I guess? * 

My outsider understanding is that maintaining this sort of thing
becomes a major headache, because of combinatorics. You don't really
want to ship a libpq and libpq-with-gss and libpq-with-oauth and
libpq-with-oauth-and-gss and ...

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects