Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Question for coverage report - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: Question for coverage report
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+mX51OxmJ3NkMiNbqUu0C_Y6R6AyiiMGe5oEKcpzRwR2g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Question for coverage report  ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Question for coverage report
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 3:55 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Oh, I didn't notice. Yeah it was also strange. Is there a possibility that complier optimization
> did prefetch and it was also counted?

FWIW, I'm used to having to set -O0 for the best coverage behavior.
-Og _usually_ works fine, but it occasionally results in nonsensical
reports for me.

--Jacob

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniele Varrazzo
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting the SQLSTATE after a failed connection
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent Behavior of GROUP BY ROLLUP in v17 vs master