On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 3:02 PM Tristan Partin <tristan@partin.io> wrote:
> I had started reviewing this patch the day it was originally sent, but
> due to circumstances I couldn't finish the review before it was
> committed. I had some thoughts with regard to improving the Python
> script itself. Attached are some improvements that make the code
> a little more pythonic as well as more easily usable locally for testing
> purposes. Some of the patches may be more valuable than others.
The code in 0001-3 looks good to me (haven't reviewed the commit
messages, but I assume they'd be squashed up anyway).
I'm lukewarm on the remaining pieces.
--Jacob
