Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+m7W-2XajSiNAXo6BVnLyU64Shidx0wPb4F==x1YRAppQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:49 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr  8, 2025 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > By adding the new .so to a different package. For example, RPM specs
> > would just let you say "hey, this .so I just built doesn't go into the
> > main client package, it goes into an add-on that depends on the client
> > package." It's the same way separate client and server packages get
> > generated from the same single build of Postgres.
>
> Do we have any idea how many packagers are interested in doing this?

I'm not sure how to answer this. The primary drivers from the dev side
are you and Tom, I think. Christoph seems to be on board with a split
as long as we don't make his life harder. Wolfgang appears to be a
packager who would not make use of a split (and in fact cannot).

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Wolfgang Walther
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER