Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+kxckoOq0Be6sasD6NP54iczO8yDguWWZ_FXrMb+Cyt0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:03 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 4:45 PM Jacob Champion
> <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Would it provide enough value for effort to explicitly mark leaky
> > procedures as such? Maybe that could shrink the grey area enough to be
> > protective?
>
> You mean like proleakproof = true/false/maybe?

Yeah, exactly.

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_combinebackup does not detect missing files
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory growth observed with C++ application consuming libpq.dll on Windows