On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 8:30 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I don't think removing it entirely from all back branches is a good
> > idea, without first making sure that there are no users.
>
> Agreed, we can't pull it from the back branches. But I'm in favor of
> pulling it from HEAD if we document how to use PAM-based RADIUS
> instead. I agree with Thomas' argument that the cost-benefit ratio
> of fixing our implementation would be poor.
+1.
I still think a WARNING in the back branches would be a kindness, to
let people know that they need to move.
--Jacob