Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+k72UYBb0gN6gcu70MRjHGL5mqL0PmK7_P2EUt+PjyDvg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:41 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> Question is though, if we added PAM
> today would we have done the same?

I assume so; the client can't tell PAM apart from LDAP or any other
plaintext method. (In the same vein, the server can't tell if the
client uses libcurl to grab a token, or something entirely different.)

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Skip collecting decoded changes of already-aborted transactions
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Reorganize cache memory contexts