Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+=n9ASNdHuC4ok+VUkUmAxwZqh_SdWGfojzw0n3iVh3eA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:40 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> My belief is that nearly everything in unsafe. We ship with very
> little marked leakproof right now, and that might be too conservative,
> but probably not by much.

Then to me, that seems like the best-case scenario for a "maybe"
classification. I'm still not sold on the idea of automatically
treating all "maybes" as leakproof (personally I'd prefer that users
surgically opt in), but if the pool is small...

Thanks,
--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Official devcontainer config