Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+=fhzr4Mm5MVwFa+pmwn-uSrPpjfYNfQ9EPBLh8xPV3cA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:57 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> wrote:
> if it's really the case that cURL is that much worse

(it is not, but I am sympathetic to the argument that if you don't use
it, you don't need it in the process space)

> However, if the other deps are considered problematic as well, then the
> ship has already sailed, and there is not point for a special case here
> anymore.

I think this line of argument is unlikely to find traction. Upthread
there were people asking if we could maybe split out other
possibly-unused dependencies in the future, like Kerberos.

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects