On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 10:06 AM Jacob Champion
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > 2. In my v5 I created a dedicated section header for protocol
> > extensions instead of including it in the extension. I think that's
> > slightly nicer, primarily so you can link to that section from the
> > StartupMessage docs (including the introductory paragraph), instead of
> > having to link to the table.
>
> Agreed, will fix.
Done in v6-0001. v6-0002/3 are the same as v5.
> As long as the consistency provides *clarity*, I'm fine with it; I'm
> just not sure that it does. I'll post a v6 with some screenshots.
screenshot-1.png shows what the combined table looks like under our
website CSS. The indent is still odd, but it looks less jarring when
"themed", IMHO.
v6-0004 is a squash commit that splits the table instead.
screenshot-2.png shows the effect of the split. I really don't like
it, but I won't die on that hill.
--Jacob
