Re: problem with compiling beta3 on mingw32+WinXP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From pasman pasmański
Subject Re: problem with compiling beta3 on mingw32+WinXP
Date
Msg-id CAOWY8=Yih=8BjaXqdHEw_zr4DrHHxUWebFQ9th7vQjdndcaecQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: problem with compiling beta3 on mingw32+WinXP  (pasman pasmański <pasman.p@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
After reinstalling mingw is ok.


2011/7/25, pasman pasmański <pasman.p@gmail.com>:
> After googling i found that mingw's gcc works with 64 bit integers.
> But printf is incompatible :( . Possible workaround: include
> inttypes.h , define macros and convert printf strings:
>
> printf("%" LL,(long long)10000000000)
>
> 2011/7/25, pasman pasmański <pasman.p@gmail.com>:
>> Hi.
>>
>> When i try to compile postgresql-beta3 on mingw32 ./configure pass ok,
>> but there is error when i do "make":
>>
>>
>> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
>> -Wdeclaration-after-statement
>>  -Wendif-labels -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
>> -I../../src/port
>> -DFRONTEND -I../../src/include -I./src/include/port/win32 -DEXEC_BACKEND
>> "-I../
>> ../src/include/port/win32"  -c -o crypt.o crypt.c
>> In file included from crypt.c:44:0:
>> ../../src/include/c.h:284:2: error: #error must have a working 64-bit
>> integer da
>> tatype
>> In file included from ../../src/include/c.h:851:0,
>>                  from crypt.c:44:
>> ../../src/include/port.h:390:0: warning: "fseeko" redefined
>> ../../src/include/pg_config_os.h:228:0: note: this is the location of the
>> previo
>> us definition
>> ../../src/include/port.h:391:0: warning: "ftello" redefined
>> ../../src/include/pg_config_os.h:229:0: note: this is the location of the
>> previo
>> us definition
>> make[2]: *** [crypt.o] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rosinkr1/postgresql-9.1beta3/src/port'
>> make[1]: *** [all-port-recurse] Error 2
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rosinkr1/postgresql-9.1beta3/src'
>> make: *** [all-src-recurse] Error 2
>>
>> Make version 3.81.
>> Status file included.
>> What is wrong ?
>>
>>
>> ------------
>> pasman
>>
>
>
> --
> ------------
> pasman
>


--
------------
pasman


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful