Re: server process (PID 1304) was terminated by exception 0xC0000142 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: server process (PID 1304) was terminated by exception 0xC0000142
Date
Msg-id CAOR=d=2xvw7E2Fei16ZSskstpbnUytkQqL3vZNV4w8BwUd4zJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: server process (PID 1304) was terminated by exception 0xC0000142  (gelin yan <dynamicgl@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:36 AM, gelin yan <dynamicgl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
> wrote:

>> If the OP needs > 100 connections on the app end, he should add a
>> connection pooler like pgbouncer or pgpool.  pgbouncer is the easier
>> of the two to configure.
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>    I have ran a PG 9.1 instance on windows 7 for one year flawlessly, My
> max_connection is 100 only. It is a high load app. I think increasing
> connection number doesn't help due to pg's architecture. As other guys said,
> it is better to use sth like conn pool to manage connections.
>
> BTW, you can check:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_%26_Installing_PostgreSQL_On_Native_Windows
>
> it mention why pg can't launch more that 125 connections on windows. I think
> this point is still valid today.

Yeah the problems with running pg on non unix platforms is all the
OTHER stuff, like pgbouncer / pgpool and so on that may or may not
support windows or are only partially supported.  And yeah I think the
limit for connections is still there, but there may be a kernel
configuration hack to overcome it.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: [Pgbouncer-general] Again, problem with pgbouncer
Next
From: Seref Arikan
Date:
Subject: Suggestions for the best strategy to emulate returning multiple sets of results