Re: PostgreSQL server embedded in NAS firmware? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: PostgreSQL server embedded in NAS firmware?
Date
Msg-id CAOR=d=2pFm_n8hp0YDNOh_if04Ki+tQnYB94c+7rLQvG_vQP+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL server embedded in NAS firmware?  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 04:19 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>> That shouldn't really matter.  Either the db is just on the NAS in
>> which case as long as pg compiles on it then the client on the main
>> unit shouldn't matter, or the data is just stored there and the db is
>> on the main unit, client and all and again it wouldn't matter.
>>
>> But the client and server do NOT have to be the same architecture to
>> work for sure.
>
>
> If I understood the OP, it is not client <--> server, it is:
> main server <--> replication server
>
> In that case architecture would matter.

Ahh I thought he'd be moving both ends of the replication onto embedded nas.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Edson Richter
Date:
Subject: Re: Moving several databases into one database with several schemas
Next
From: Stuart Bishop
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump on hot standby canceled despite hot_standby_feedback=on