Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres
Date
Msg-id CAOR=d=2QNts+9tS6SYcgKhSM56MbJPR2Js=B9YWfGehUVR+i+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres  (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 2/7/12 4:59 PM, Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
>> Per the thread from last month, I've updated the default
>> random_page_cost on Heroku Postgres to reduce the expected cost of a
>> random_page on all new databases.
>
> This is because Heroku uses AWS storage, which has fast seeks but poor
> throughput compared to internal disk on a standard system, BTW.

Also judging by the other thread, it might be something to stop closer
to 1.2 to 1.4 or something.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres
Next
From: Peter van Hardenberg
Date:
Subject: Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres