Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Benjamin Leff
Subject Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources
Date
Msg-id CAOLxLw8GhSHb2EpuQanfL06cVt8m+dvNLmtb9MxUo6jALAbHfw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources
List pgsql-hackers
> I believe the prevailing opinion was that the amount
of time saved by not building all of PG didn't justify the maintenance
effort to keep the build scripts working for that case

IMO, it’s not just about time. For bare bones package managers when there’s no need to build the server, this saves a few GB.


--
Benjamin W. Leff
(516) 754-3453


On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 9:57 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 20.10.25 22:43, Benjamin Leff wrote:
>> Are there any plans to support a client-only (no server) build in meson?

> I'm not aware of such plans.  But that doesn't mean somebody couldn't
> propose one.

Years ago we had support for client-only builds on at least some
toolchains (MSVC at least, not sure about elsewhere).  That got
dropped though.  I believe the prevailing opinion was that the amount
of time saved by not building all of PG didn't justify the maintenance
effort to keep the build scripts working for that case.  I think that
that argument hasn't lost its force, so we'd be likely to reject any
such proposal.

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Alger
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_trigger_ddl() to retrieve the CREATE TRIGGER statement
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_trigger_ddl() to retrieve the CREATE TRIGGER statement