Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 21:38, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> a écrit :
> On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:09, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Basically, pg_upgrade has avoided any backend changes that could be > controlled by GUCs and I am not sure we want to start adding such > changes for just this.
In principle I think it’s sound to try to avoid backend changes where possible without sacrificing robustness.
I agree, but it seems quite more likely that an extension relying on a bgworker changes this guc, compared to an extension forcing autovacuum to be on for instance.
