On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> Julien Rouhaund, who has proposed a patch for partition-wise ordering
> mentioned to me offlist that the comments for PartitionBoundInfoData
> do not mention the fact that the datums in datums array are ordered. I
> think that's important to mention there. So here's patch to do that.
>
Thanks for the patch! I agree this should mentioned in the comment.
small typo:
+ * PartitionBoundInfoData structures for two partitioned table with
exactly same
should be "tables".
