Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CAOBaU_ZLs8OzPSOG4m-bLrg4AC3BO6GSo77VvUhAVOoOr-UD7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:31 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> Rather than use size, I'd be inclined to say use this if the source
> database is marked as a template, and use the copydir approach for
> anything that isn't.

Looks like a good approach.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Next
From: 孙冰
Date:
Subject: Confused by the default privilege