Re: WAL usage calculation patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Date
Msg-id CAOBaU_ZA6gfckcOPR_LTdt-Jgbo=ne8K9ODW-m6PHND52-4AGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL usage calculation patch  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WAL usage calculation patch  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Re: WAL usage calculation patch  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:18 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:05 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:38 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:22 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > > I agree with that definition.  I can send a cleanup patch if there's
> > > > no objection.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Okay, feel free to send the patch.  Thanks for taking the initiative
> > > to write a patch for this.
> > >
> >
> > Julien, are you planning to write a cleanup patch for this open item?
>
> Sorry Amit, I've been quite busy at work for the last couple of days.
> I'll take care of that this morning for sure!

Here's the patch.  I included the content of
v3-fix_explain_wal_output.patch you provided before, and tried to
consistently replace full page writes/fpw to full page images/fpi
everywhere on top of it (so documentation, command output, variable
names and comments).

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve errors when setting incorrect bounds for SSL protocols
Next
From: Sumanta Mukherjee
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup