Re: Pg_upgrade problem. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From obi reddy
Subject Re: Pg_upgrade problem.
Date
Msg-id CAO7L2Zz4xn=6y4ui4jBZJsU_QZqp2kcP1GkZEq5dWKBCemxTNg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pg_upgrade problem.  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
Thank you for your response. Problem is resolved.  I tried another way its working fine.  
Thank you so much 
OBIREDDY. G


> It's a "oneclic "

 From here?:

https://www.enterprisedb.com/downloads/postgres-postgresql-downloads

To get an answer you will need to provide as much basic information as
you can. So in addition to what you have provided we need:

1) Is the 9.6 instance also from EDB(enterprisedb.com)?

2) Have you created any extensions in the 9.6 instance and if so what?

3) Is there a '/opt/postgresql/96/bin/passwd'?

4) Is there a '/opt/postgresql/10/bin/passwd'?

5) What is the complete pg_upgrade command you are using?



>
>
>     What was the source for the installs of the 9.6 and 10 instances of
>     Postgres?:
>
>     1) RPM
>          If so from what repo?
>
>     2) Other
>          If so what and from where?
>
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >     What is the actual OS?
>      >
>      >     Where did you install 9.6 and 10 from?
>      >
>      >      >
>      >      >      > When I am trying to upgrade 9.6 to 10 . I'M getting
>      >     this error ,
>      >      >     please
>      >      >      > help me out
>      >      >
>      >      >     What OS and version?
>      >      >
>      >      >     Where did you install Postgres from?
>      >      >
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      > pg_upgrade check for "/opt/postgresql/10/bin/passwd"
>      >     failed: no such
>      >      >      > file or directory failure, exiting
>      >      >
>      >      >     AFAIK, passwd is not a regular binary in the community
>      >     edition. Have
>      >      >     you
>      >      >     installed an extension in the 9.6 instance that you
>     have not
>      >     installed
>      >      >     in the 10 instance? Or something else along that line?
>      >      >
>      >      >
>      >      >     --
>      >      >     Adrian Klaver
>      >      > adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
>     <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
>     <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>>
>      >     <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
>     <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
>     <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>>>
>      >      >
>      >
>      >
>      >     --
>      >     Adrian Klaver
>      > adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
>     <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>>
>      >
>
>
>     --
>     Adrian Klaver
>     adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Brent Wood
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp/hstore query?
Next
From: Rama Krishnan
Date:
Subject: Re: Query processing in postgresql