Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: SERIALIZABLE and INSERTs with multiple VALUES - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jason Dusek
Subject Re: SERIALIZABLE and INSERTs with multiple VALUES
Date
Msg-id CAO3NbwOuu43+qBv45qnxeur=mEyjmJUVH18R04OsfRLpezTNAA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SERIALIZABLE and INSERTs with multiple VALUES  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
SELECT version(),      (SELECT setting FROM pg_settings WHERE name = 'default_transaction_deferrable') AS default_transaction_deferrable,      (SELECT setting FROM pg_settings WHERE name = 'default_transaction_isolation') AS default_transaction_isolation;
─[ RECORD 1 ]──────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
version                        │ PostgreSQL 9.5.4 on x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0, compiled by Apple LLVM version 8.0.0 (clang-800.0.38), 64-bit
default_transaction_deferrable │ on
default_transaction_isolation  │ serializable
​

On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 at 13:00 Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jason Dusek <jason.dusek@gmail.com> wrote:

> I notice the following oddity:

>  =# CREATE TABLE with_pk (i integer PRIMARY KEY);
> CREATE TABLE

>  =# BEGIN;
> BEGIN
>  =# INSERT INTO with_pk VALUES (2), (2) ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
> ERROR:  could not serialize access due to concurrent update
>  =# END;
> ROLLBACK

I don't see that on development HEAD.  What version are you
running?  What is your setting for default_transaction_isolation?

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chris Richards
Date:
Subject: Re: LOG: munmap(0x7fff80000000) failed: Invalid argument
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LOG: munmap(0x7fff80000000) failed: Invalid argument