Re: Autoprewarm workers terminated due to a segmentation fault - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Glauber Batista
Subject Re: Autoprewarm workers terminated due to a segmentation fault
Date
Msg-id CAO+_mTT-7EB=vWmpDbaZ_H0J7pEmv8fsBMvYdnc-my7pZTW2Zw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
List pgsql-bugs
Hello,

I finally got the chance and time to test the patch. I'm using it on a replica for now and it's working as expected.

2026-07-01 19:09:35 UTC::@:[169848]:LOG:  database system is ready to accept read-only connections
2026-07-01 19:09:35 UTC::@:[174803]:LOG:  started streaming WAL from primary at B7E/24000000 on timeline 1
2026-07-01 19:09:35 UTC::@:[174804]:LOG:  autoprewarm successfully prewarmed 0 of 131072 previously-loaded blocks

Thank you all for your hard work!

Best,
Glauber Cassiano Batista



Em seg., 29 de jun. de 2026 às 12:13, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> escreveu:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 1:55 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
>
> FWIW I've committed the v2 fix (I liked it more), and I've backpatched
> it to 18.

Thank you so much for doing this. I had it on my list for next week,
but a few other things got ahead of it. I really, really appreciate
you taking on committing it!

- Melanie

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19524: NaN handling in btree_gist's float4/float8 opclasses
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw:Re: Fw: gbt_var_consistent in contrib/btree_gist/btree_utils_var.c has internal-node type confusion on the <> strategy, bypassing exclusion constraints