Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaDnZutXz9-T2_7OMofTHVk6mfnOW_gLJhDdNiUFtbyGMg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:03 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 4/22/24 13:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:21 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
> [snip]
>
>     Which gets us back to your comment upstream:
>
>     "What the VACUUM docs "should" do, it seems, is suggest CLUSTER on the
>     PK, if the PK is a sequence (whether that be an actual sequence, or a
>     timestamp or something else that grows monotonically)."
>
>     This is a case specific to you and this particular circumstance, not a
>     general rule for VACUUM FULL. If for no other reason then it might make
>     more sense for the application that the CLUSTER be done on some other
>     index then the PK.
>
>
> On Stack Exchange, I've got a question on how to determine when to run
> CLUSTER.  It ties in strongly with this thread..
>

And the link is?

Sorry.  Got distracted by the answer.

 
 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: issue with reading hostname
Next
From: Atul Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: issue with reading hostname