Re: MAT. VIEW security problems and PG 10-11 versions? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: MAT. VIEW security problems and PG 10-11 versions?
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaCvUQ9OJ31JFnxBLBk4jmyhEO0aRxJS1T9sbLK7P=S9mA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MAT. VIEW security problems and PG 10-11 versions?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:44 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2024, at 08:56, Durumdara <durumdara@gmail.com> wrote:

> But maybe that's because PG 10 and 11 are no longer supported - and not because they aren't affected by the issues.

EOL versions do not recieve security updates and are not verified during
security analysis and fixing, so hence they aren't listed.  Anyone still
running 10 or 11 is encouraged to upgrade to a supported version.

I wonder if MSFT and Oracle test EOL versions of their software for discovered bugs.   Maybe, but I doubt it, for the very same reason the PGDG doesn't do it.

But even if they do... how far back would they go?  Unless they go back to Windows 1.0, and Oracle 1.0, _someone_ would complain.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Compressing large column by moving it to a unique table
Next
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: How to do faster DML