Re: Backups with filesystem snapshots - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Backups with filesystem snapshots
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaBG3yn7-BCgjDuUWqusKSBSsCwk1Lw+vSe26EZQRfMtXw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Backups with filesystem snapshots  (Nick Cleaton <nick@cleaton.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 9:01 AM Nick Cleaton <nick@cleaton.net> wrote:
If I take an instantaneous filesystem-level snapshot of the postgres
data directory underneath a running postgres server, is that a safe
backup without doing any pg_start_backup/pg_stop_backup ?

It seems like it should be, so long as I get an atomic snapshot that
includes both data and wal, because starting up from that snapshot
should look the same as recovering from an unclean postgres shutdown
due to a kernel panic.

We once restored a whole-system VMware snapshot to a new VM (new IP address and everything). When I logged in, PG started up without a hiccup; it took a couple of minutes while WALs rolled forward, but that's to be expected.

Postgresql didn't (and doesn't) know anything about when snapshots are taken.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Nick Cleaton
Date:
Subject: Backups with filesystem snapshots
Next
From: Smith
Date:
Subject: Bitnami deprecation