Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hamid Akhtar
Subject Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Date
Msg-id CANugjhtmgsir6SqPGGh74dcaEoWGVD3b3UpBJSrwhH14+zmW3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
List pgsql-hackers
There have been no real objections on this patch and it seems to work. So, IMHO, the only thing that needs to be done is perhaps update the patch so that it applies clearly on the master branch.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:31 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:


On 2020/07/27 17:53, Hamid Akhtar wrote:
> Applying the patch to the current master branch throws 9 hunks. AFAICT, the patch is good otherwise.

So you think that the patch can be marked as Ready for Committer?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION


--
Highgo Software (Canada/China/Pakistan)
URL : www.highgo.ca
ADDR: 10318 WHALLEY BLVD, Surrey, BC
CELL:+923335449950  EMAIL: mailto:hamid.akhtar@highgo.ca
SKYPE: engineeredvirus

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
Date:
Subject: Doc patch: mention indexes in pg_inherits docs
Next
From: Asif Rehman
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: unescape_text function