Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Melvin Davidson
Subject Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information
Date
Msg-id CANu8Fiw9oyL_OoosZHpr0QgvTavaGPFHcREaou1peOcY5d2iYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information  (Jack Christensen <jack@jackchristensen.com>)
Responses Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-general
In addition to the other great comments and advice that have been posted, you might want to review the "Database Compatibility Technology for Oracle" document from EnterpriseDB.

http://www.enterprisedb.com/solutions/oracle-compatibility-technology


On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Jack Christensen <jack@jackchristensen.com> wrote:
On 05/09/2015 06:33 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
Temporary tables will be in memory unless they overflow work_mem and we do support unlogged tables and tablespaces which you could stick out on a ramdisk if you want.
I would suggest not putting a table space on a ramdisk. According to the docs this risks corrupting the entire cluster.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/manage-ag-tablespaces.html

Jack




--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



--
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize.  Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jack Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information
Next
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: RPM building tools and info missing?