Re: Why latestRemovedXid|cuteoff_xid are always sent? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michail Nikolaev
Subject Re: Why latestRemovedXid|cuteoff_xid are always sent?
Date
Msg-id CANtu0ojJoKEjW2dNcy+W8SPgs5XiErXY0dERf411iLPSz9HWYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why latestRemovedXid|cuteoff_xid are always sent?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello, Peter.

Thanks for your explanation. One of the reasons I was asking - is an idea to use the same technique in the "LP_DEAD index hint bits on standby" WIP patch to reduce the amount of additional WAL.

Now I am sure such optimization should work correctly.

Thanks, 
Michail.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Next
From: japin
Date:
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN/EXPLAIN ANALYZE REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW