Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Rodrigo Barboza
Subject Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres
Date
Msg-id CANs8QJaNdx0Y7jK5a7rEC0kfQCXHGQsTXeuMbu3Ep1xMCTUr0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Ok, now I'm lost, who is right about the limit? Rob or Pavel?

Rob, I know it should be a 64 bit, and it will be soon, but there are good reasons for this scenario and it's ok for now.


On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello

2013/3/18 Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj@gmail.com>:
> Hi guys, I am worried about the effective_cache_size.
> I run a 32-bits postgres installation on a machine with 64 bits kernel.
> Should I limit effective_cache_size to a maximum of 2.5gb?

sure and probably little bit less

Regards

Pavel

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres