Re: Parallel Aggregate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Sewell
Subject Re: Parallel Aggregate
Date
Msg-id CANkGpBtSeWy8vcqgCZ0s_at1dHmir0=XFCCB+4sPmHFuON_h4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Aggregate  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

I kind of doubt this would work well, but somebody could write a patch
for it and try it out.

OK I'll give this a go today and report back.

Would the eventual plan be to use pg_proc.procost for the functions from each aggregate concerned? If so I might have a peek at that too, although I imagine I won't get far.

Cheers,


The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Explain [Analyze] produces parallel scan for select Into table statements.
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregate