Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY locking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Sewell
Subject Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY locking
Date
Msg-id CANkGpBt79rgAKrfSTE8_t+XHE0knMzuN=V4Vhf1uRqS6KWsJJw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to ADD FOREIGN KEY locking  (James Sewell <james.sewell@lisasoft.com>)
Responses Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY locking  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Oh,

I've just noticed something in the Commit fest post

- Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL

Perhaps I just need to be more patient.

Cheers,


James Sewell,
 Solutions Architect
______________________________________
 

Level 2, 50 Queen St, Melbourne VIC 3000

(+61) 3 8370 8000  W www.lisasoft.com  (+61) 3 8370 8099
 

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:57 AM, James Sewell <james.sewell@lisasoft.com> wrote:
Hello all,

When I add a FK with a statement like this:

ALTER TABLE a ADD FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES b(id);

I see a lock on table b:

select locktype,mode,granted from pg_locks, pg_stat_activity where relation::regclass::text = 'b' AND pg_locks.pid = pg_stat_activity.pid;

locktype | relation
mode     | AccessShareLock
granted  | t
query     | SOME LONG RUNNING QUERY WHICH SELECTS FROM b

locktype | relation
mode     | AccessExclusiveLock
granted  | f
query     | ALTER TABLE a ADD FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES b(id);

This means that my add key won't complete until my long running query does. That seems a bit odd to me? In this database there are lots of datawarehouse type queries running, which makes it a bit hard for me to schedule this operation.

Is this just a manifestation of adding the key being in an ALTER TABLE, which always needs an AccessExclusiveLock? Or am I missing some edge case when this lock would be required in this circumstance?

No real urgency on this question, I just found it a bit strange and thought someone might be able to shed some light.

James Sewell,
Solutions Architect
______________________________________
 

Level 2, 50 Queen St, Melbourne VIC 3000

(+61) 3 8370 8000  W www.lisasoft.com  (+61) 3 8370 8099
 



The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Sewell
Date:
Subject: ADD FOREIGN KEY locking
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL