Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shlok Kyal
Subject Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Date
Msg-id CANhcyEXvcwHE54UEnatUKEs7v6jwRQQi_4qC64ngCfw1zTd5hg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication  (Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 09:13, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 11:11, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kuroda-san,
> >
> > > > I have also modified the tests in 0001 patch. These changes are only
> > > > related to syntax of writing tests.
> > >
> > > LGTM. I found small improvements, please find the attached.
> >
> > I have applied the changes and updated the patch.
> >
>  Patches needed a rebase. Attached the rebased patch.
>
Patches need a rebase. Attached the rebased patch.

Thanks and regards,
Shlok Kyal

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove wal_[sync|write][_time] from pg_stat_wal and track_wal_io_timing
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix assert failure when decoding XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE on primary