> I don't think this is a given ... In fact, IMO if we're only two or > three fixes away from having it all nice and consistent, I think > reverting is not necessary.
Sure. It's the "if" part of that sentence that I'm not too sure about.
Any specific area of the code that you think is/has become fragile (apart from the non-support for CREATE TABLE based ONLY constraints)? The second bug is a variant of the first. And I have provided a patch for it.
