Re: One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps? - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Sean Davis
Subject Re: One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps?
Date
Msg-id CANeAVB=OXN=deEMRh90w8OLDcsYBbTbRa2PuR3UH1gc12tdABg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps?  (Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>)
Responses Re: One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps?
List pgsql-novice
A single postgresql server can host multiple separate databases, each with its own data, authentication, etc.  This single-server, multiple-database approach is a typical deployment strategy.  






On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:

Hello!

First, I apologize if this email sounds very... novice. I came from MS SQL Server background, and am recently 'plunged' into a mid-to-long term project to drop dependencies on proprietary databases, and use PostgreSQL instead.

Now, in MS SQL Server, I can create a single server to service several apps together. If the app is a light load and doesn't require something more than db_owner privileges, I usually just clump them together in the Default instance, using a new 'database'. If the app has heavier requirements, then I would spin up a new instance, on the same server (provided RAM and IOPS requirements suffice, of course).

How would the same principle be applied in PostgreSQL?

Thanks in advance for your kind guide.

Rgds,
--


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Pandu Poluan
Date:
Subject: One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps?
Next
From: Pandu Poluan
Date:
Subject: Re: One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps?