Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes
Date
Msg-id CANbhV-HbnZMsBU3Bqxt_VvymuOm=9FdDsZkiCAeZ6fLXRtQWZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:12 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:31 PM Simon Riggs
> <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> > I attach both clean and compare versions.
> >
>
> Do we want to hold this work for PG15 or commit in PG14 and backpatch
> it till v10 where we have made hash indexes crash-safe? I would vote
> for committing in PG14 and backpatch it till v10, however, I am fine
> if we want to commit just to PG14 or PG15.

Backpatch makes sense to me, but since not everyone will be reading
this thread, I would look towards PG15 only first. We may yet pick up
additional corrections or additions before a backpatch, if that is
agreed.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in HEAD and 13 after calling COMMIT in a stored proc
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests