On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 03:43, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:41 AM Simon Riggs
> <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > The reason to mention this now is that it would give more space than
> > 56bit limit being suggested here.
>
> Isn't 2^56 enough, though?
For me, yes.
To the above comment, I followed with:
> I am not opposed to the current
> patch, just finding ways to remove some objections mentioned by
> others, if those became blockers.
So it seems we can continue with the patch.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
