Re: Parallel grouping sets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Guo
Subject Re: Parallel grouping sets
Date
Msg-id CAN_9JTx3NM12ZDzEYcOVLFiCBvwMHyM0gENvtTpKBoOOgcs=kw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel grouping sets  (Richard Guo <riguo@pivotal.io>)
Responses Re: Parallel grouping sets
List pgsql-hackers
I realized that there are two patches in this thread that are
implemented according to different methods, which causes confusion. So I
decide to update this thread with only one patch, i.e. the patch for
'Implementation 1' as described in the first email and then move the
other patch to a separate thread.

With this idea, here is the patch for 'Implementation 1' that is rebased
with the latest master.

Thanks
Richard

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 3:24 PM Richard Guo <riguo@pivotal.io> wrote:

On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 10:03 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 07:07:22PM +0800, Pengzhou Tang wrote:
> Richard pointed out that he get incorrect results with the patch I
> attached, there are bugs somewhere,
> I fixed them now and attached the newest version, please refer to [1] for
> the fix.

Mr Robot is reporting that the latest patch fails to build at least on
Windows.  Could you please send a rebase?  I have moved for now the
patch to next CF, waiting on author.

Thanks for reporting this issue. Here is the rebase.

Thanks
Richard
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: range_agg
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command fromrecovery.conf or command line