On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 9:08 PM Alvaro Herrera <
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Aug-23, Asim R P wrote:
>
> > As part of the fault injector patch set [1], I added a new "blocking"
> > keyword to isolation grammar so that a step can be declared as blocking.
> > See patch 0002-Add-syntax-to-declare-a-step-that-is-expected-to-block.
>
> One point to that implementation is that in that design a step is
> globally declared to be blocking, but in reality that's the wrong way to
> see things: a step might block in some permutations and not others. So
> I think we should do as Michael suggested: it's the permutation that has
> to have a way to mark a given step as blocking, not the step itself.
Asim
